Best SEO Training Programs
Evaluation Criteria for Best SEO Training Programs
  • UPWARD TREND
  • DOWNWARD TREND
  • NO
    CHANGE

Best SEO Training Programs Australia - July 2014

RANK COMPANY NAME YEAR FOUNDED REVENUE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES ACTIVE CLIENTS CLIENT RETENTION RATE PRICING CLIENTS Overall Score Composite score based on criterias and quality of work observed.
0100
GVGE
ComprehensiveFirm's training is comprehensive, inclusive, and complete.VarianceFirm's training program offers a diversity of courses at all levels.ComprehensionFirm's training ability to use clear and easy to understand language, making it easier to learn and adopt training.CurrentFirm's program offering is timely to current trends.FeedbackFirm's competence and process in providing meaningful feedback to trainees that encourages learning. Change in Rank Indicates shift in rank from previous month's rank.
1st Award
TrainSEM Pty Ltd

Melbourne, New South Wales Ash Nallawalla 61-396003993_ Visit TrainSEM Pty Ltd File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2002 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 43 90% L Sensis, BoxFreeIT.com.au, Sensis Pty Ltd, Scope Systems, National Australia Bank
99.6%
99 100 100 99 100 +2 More Info
2nd Award
Search Engine Academy Qld

Springfield, Queensland Sue Cooper 61-731703280_ Visit Search Engine Academy Qld File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2001 $3 million - $4,999,999 26 - 50 55 90% M Jacaranda Grove Marketing, Cathay Pacific, rejuvaDERM, Etienne Lawyers, PG Graphic Design
100%
100 100 100 100 100 NC More Info
3rd Award
Loves Data Pty Limited

Mosman, New South Wales Marta Sengers 61-299606577 _ Visit Loves Data Pty Limited File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
1998 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 100+ 95% H Clemenger Agency, Flight Centre, Allergen Bureau, Clorox Commercial, Universal Music
98.8%
100 99 98 99 98 -2 More Info
4
Bruce Clay

Moorpark, USA Bruce Clay 866-517-1900_ Visit Bruce Clay File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
1996 Over $10 million Above 100 200 90% M Century21, Weather.com, FaceBook, LL Bean, Sportsmans Guide
99%
98 100 99 98 100 NC More Info
5
Web Training Workshop

Brookvale, New South Wales Clive Hawkins 1300-852-877_ Visit Web Training Workshop File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2002 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 50+ 95% M Provided on application
99.4%
100 98 100 99 100 NC More Info
6
Netseek Pty Ltd

Eveleigh, New South Wales Graham Kelly 61-292094055_ Visit Netseek Pty Ltd File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
1999 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 50+ 89% L Confidential
98.6%
99 100 99 98 97 NC More Info
7
Mitash - Results Driven Interactive Agency

Clarinda, Victoria Ozzie Mitash 61-390402318_ Visit Mitash - Results Driven Interactive Agency File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2007 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 100+ 96% M Protero Wines, Anna & Sally, Purebaby - Organic Clothing, Roam Express - Transurban, Banalasta
98.2%
96 98 99 98 100 NC More Info
8
DGM Australia

Pyrmont, New South Wales Fionn Hyndman 61-285690000_ Visit DGM Australia File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2003 $250,000 - $999,000 11 - 25 21 88% M Bing Lee, Johnson & Johnson, Nivea, St. George, Lenovo
97.6%
96 98 96 98 100 NC More Info
9
City Desktop

Sydney, New South Wales Jamie Robertson 1300-441-891_ Visit City Desktop File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2006 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 100+ 80% L Confidential
97.4%
96 97 98 97 99 NC More Info
10
Panalysis Pty Ltd

Lane Cove, New South Wales Rod Jacka 61-280016330 _ Visit Panalysis Pty Ltd File A Complaint
Commend This Vendor
2001 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 100+ 92% M Clear Haven Center, eBook, Google
97.2%
97 98 97 98 96 NC More Info

Evaluation Criteria - How We Identify The Best SEO Training Programs in Australia

topseos.com evaluates and ranks the best training program companies in the industry. As the independent authority on search vendors, we complete an in-depth analysis of every company on the list by looking into the processes of a company. We often times then contact different clients of each company to obtain their evaluations. The top companies as rated by topseos.com are then compiled to the list of the best.

topseos identified five key areas that are vital to quality training programs. These key areas include the training's comprehensiveness, variance, comprehension, current information, and feedback.

The first aspect that is evaluated by us is the comprehensiveness of the training. Does the program provide in-depth information covering the many different topics within the specified internet marketing strategy?  At the end of the training program what is accomplished?

The variance of the programs that are offered is the next factor reviewed. Are there different levels of training offered to target the skill set of the audience that is present?  Does the vendor offer programs for a wide variety of internet marketing strategies?

Comprehension is another factor that is assessed.  How easily is the information retained?  Are various types of teaching used to reach the different learning styles of people?

We also evaluate how current the training is.  Are the strategies and tactics that are covered in the training still effective in the ever-changing internet marketing world? How often are the programs reviewed by the vendor to ensure the latest information is provided.

The final aspect that is assessed is the feedback. Is the training environment interactive that allows for questions and feedback from the trainees?

General Queries

  • What type of needs analysis was conducted before work initiated?
  • What type of a ROI were you anticipating, what was achieved and in what time frame?
  • What would be 3 things you would change about your experience?
  • What was your total investment?
  • Rate your overall experience (1-10; 10 being the highest).

 

Project Specific Queries :

  • Did the training program tackle relevant issues?
  • Is there a noticeable change in your skill set after having attended the training program? If so, what do you now excel at?
  • What was the most complex / challenging technical aspect that the training covered?
  • Were any post-training services provided? If so, for how long?
  • Was any kind of evaluation was conducted to gauge trainee comprehension?